<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									Confirming feasibility of Raid 10 with this drives - Creating Volumes				            </title>
            <link>https://forums.softraid.com/creating-volumes/confirming-feasibility-of-raid-10-with-this-drives/</link>
            <description>SoftRAID Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 19:57:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>RE: Confirming feasibility of Raid 10 with this drives</title>
                        <link>https://forums.softraid.com/creating-volumes/confirming-feasibility-of-raid-10-with-this-drives/#post-24812</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 04:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[For anyone that might read this in the future, since the OP&#039;s end result was 12TB RAID 0 speed and 12TB backup storage and redundancy, that can also be achieved by creating a 8TB 4-drive RAI...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone that might read this in the future, since the OP's end result was 12TB RAID 0 speed and 12TB backup storage and redundancy, that can also be achieved by creating a 8TB 4-drive RAID 1+0, giving balance of speed and redundancy, and a 4TB 2-drive RAID 1. So the result is virtually the same as the OP but across two smaller volumes, still giving a good balance of speed and redundancy.</p>
<p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://forums.softraid.com/creating-volumes/">Creating Volumes</category>                        <dc:creator>smayer97</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.softraid.com/creating-volumes/confirming-feasibility-of-raid-10-with-this-drives/#post-24812</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>RE: Confirming feasibility of Raid 10 with this drives</title>
                        <link>https://forums.softraid.com/creating-volumes/confirming-feasibility-of-raid-10-with-this-drives/#post-14828</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 06:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[No.
All partitions in a RAID volume are identical with RAID. (yes some hardware RAID allows this to be mixed sized, but it sacrifices robustness)
Note also, RAID 1+0 is a single volume, it...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.</p>
<p>All partitions in a RAID volume are identical with RAID. (yes some hardware RAID allows this to be mixed sized, but it sacrifices robustness)</p>
<p>Note also, RAID 1+0 is a single volume, it is created at the same time for all disks.</p>
<p>You could create 2 8TB volumes, then have space for another 8TB Mirror volume. (on the remainder of the 8TB), but that is probably not ideal.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Its up to you. You could also have an 8TB RAID 0, and a 16TB RAID 1, since mirroring protects your data better and you can use that for saving files/archiving etc. </p>
<p>Remember to consider backups/off site storage in your plans.</p>
<p>Also, I would go for Thunderbay's, over USB. Much superior.</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://forums.softraid.com/creating-volumes/">Creating Volumes</category>                        <dc:creator>SoftRAID Support</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.softraid.com/creating-volumes/confirming-feasibility-of-raid-10-with-this-drives/#post-14828</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Confirming feasibility of Raid 10 with this drives</title>
                        <link>https://forums.softraid.com/creating-volumes/confirming-feasibility-of-raid-10-with-this-drives/#post-14827</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2022 21:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hello there, I&#039;m thinking to buy either the OWC Thunderbay 4 or the OWC Mercury Elite Pro Quad.
I Already Have the following HDD disks 2 x 8TB2 x 4TB
My idea is to create 2 Raid 0 with 1x8...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello there, I'm thinking to buy either the OWC Thunderbay 4 or the OWC Mercury Elite Pro Quad.</p>
<p>I Already Have the following HDD disks <br />2 x 8TB<br />2 x 4TB</p>
<p>My idea is to create 2 Raid 0 with 1x8TB + 1x4TB and have a 12TB volume paired in a RAID 1 for redundancy.<br /><br />Will this work with Softraid?<br /><br />Thank you in advance.</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://forums.softraid.com/creating-volumes/">Creating Volumes</category>                        <dc:creator>facupuig</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.softraid.com/creating-volumes/confirming-feasibility-of-raid-10-with-this-drives/#post-14827</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced (Requested URI contains query) 

Served from: forums.softraid.com @ 2026-04-21 14:57:39 by W3 Total Cache
-->